[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250724083001.362882-3-yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:30:00 +0800
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk,
hch@....de,
jack@...e.cz
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tangyeechou@...il.com,
Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] blk-wbt: Eliminate ambiguity in the comments of struct rq_wb
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
In the current implementation, the last_issue and last_comp members of
struct rq_wb are used only by read requests and not by non-throttled write
requests. Therefore, eliminate the ambiguity here.
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
---
block/blk-wbt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index 30886d44f6cd..eb8037bae0bd 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ struct rq_wb {
u64 sync_issue;
void *sync_cookie;
- unsigned long last_issue; /* last non-throttled issue */
- unsigned long last_comp; /* last non-throttled comp */
+ unsigned long last_issue; /* issue time of last read rq */
+ unsigned long last_comp; /* completion time of last read rq */
unsigned long min_lat_nsec;
struct rq_qos rqos;
struct rq_wait rq_wait[WBT_NUM_RWQ];
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists