[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15e46f69-f270-0520-1ad4-874448439d2b@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:49:59 +0800
From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic
code
On 2025/7/24 上午9:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:39:40 +0800
> Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
>>> #define kvm_fpu_load_symbol \
>>> {0, "unload"}, \
>>> {1, "load"}
>>>
>> Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Should this go through the loongarch tree or should I take it?
Huacai,
What is your point about this?
Regards
Bibo Mao
>
> Either way works for me.
>
> -- Steve
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists