[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H4TGus35B6ONdkSOMwWw+H6NRmHStV-Xu7vUYYrkDGfUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 19:56:42 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 9:51 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2025/7/24 上午9:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:39:40 +0800
> > Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >
> >>> #define kvm_fpu_load_symbol \
> >>> {0, "unload"}, \
> >>> {1, "load"}
> >>>
> >> Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Should this go through the loongarch tree or should I take it?
> Huacai,
>
> What is your point about this?
I will take it, thanks.
Huacai
>
> Regards
> Bibo Mao
> >
> > Either way works for me.
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists