[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250727173125.407f92fa@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 17:31:25 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko
<andy@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] hwmon: iio: Add helper function for creating
attributes
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 21:20:21 -0400
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev> wrote:
> Add a helper function to create attributes and initialize their fields.
> This reduces repetition when creating several attributes per channel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
> ---
>
> drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> index bba8919377eb..7dc156d2aea4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> @@ -24,13 +24,15 @@
> * @attr_group: the group of attributes
> * @groups: null terminated array of attribute groups
> * @attrs: null terminated array of attribute pointers.
> + * @num_attrs: length of @attrs
> */
> struct iio_hwmon_state {
> struct iio_channel *channels;
> - int num_channels;
> struct attribute_group attr_group;
> const struct attribute_group *groups[2];
> struct attribute **attrs;
> + size_t num_attrs;
It's a little unfortunate that we need to keep the state around when it
is only relevant in probe.
> + int num_channels;
> };
>
> static ssize_t iio_hwmon_read_label(struct device *dev,
> @@ -93,12 +95,39 @@ static ssize_t iio_hwmon_read_val(struct device *dev,
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", result);
> }
>
> +static int add_device_attr(struct device *dev, struct iio_hwmon_state *st,
That's a very generic name. I'd prefix it to avoid potential namespace
issues in future.
> + ssize_t (*show)(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf),
> + int i, const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> + struct sensor_device_attribute *a;
> + va_list ap;
> +
> + a = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*a), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!a)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sysfs_attr_init(&a->dev_attr.attr);
> + va_start(ap, fmt);
> + a->dev_attr.attr.name = devm_kvasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, fmt, ap);
> + va_end(ap);
> + if (!a->dev_attr.attr.name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + a->dev_attr.show = show;
> + a->dev_attr.attr.mode = 0444;
> + a->index = i;
> +
> + st->attrs[st->num_attrs++] = &a->dev_attr.attr
I wonder if we should break this up into
static attribute *iio_hwmon_alloc_attr();
and setting st->attrs in the caller as then we can make num_attrs a local
variable.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int iio_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct iio_hwmon_state *st;
> - struct sensor_device_attribute *a;
> - int ret, i, attr = 0;
> + int ret, i;
> int in_i = 1, temp_i = 1, curr_i = 1, humidity_i = 1, power_i = 1;
> enum iio_chan_type type;
> struct iio_channel *channels;
> @@ -136,11 +165,6 @@ static int iio_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> const char *prefix;
> int n;
>
> - a = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*a), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (a == NULL)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - sysfs_attr_init(&a->dev_attr.attr);
> ret = iio_get_channel_type(&st->channels[i], &type);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -170,36 +194,18 @@ static int iio_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - a->dev_attr.attr.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> - "%s%d_input",
> - prefix, n);
> - if (a->dev_attr.attr.name == NULL)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - a->dev_attr.show = iio_hwmon_read_val;
> - a->dev_attr.attr.mode = 0444;
> - a->index = i;
> - st->attrs[attr++] = &a->dev_attr.attr;
> + ret = add_device_attr(dev, st, iio_hwmon_read_val, i,
> + "%s%d_input", prefix, n);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> /* Let's see if we have a label... */
> - if (iio_read_channel_label(&st->channels[i], buf) < 0)
> - continue;
> -
> - a = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*a), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (a == NULL)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - sysfs_attr_init(&a->dev_attr.attr);
> - a->dev_attr.attr.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> - "%s%d_label",
> - prefix, n);
> - if (!a->dev_attr.attr.name)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - a->dev_attr.show = iio_hwmon_read_label;
> - a->dev_attr.attr.mode = 0444;
> - a->index = i;
> - st->attrs[attr++] = &a->dev_attr.attr;
> + if (iio_read_channel_label(&st->channels[i], buf) >= 0) {
> + ret = add_device_attr(dev, st, iio_hwmon_read_label,
> + i, "%s%d_label", prefix, n);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
>
> devm_free_pages(dev, (unsigned long)buf);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists