[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <649d78b90d026a3c9bca40b257e303fe5d5a4f22.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 06:21:43 +0000
From: Friday Yang (杨阳) <Friday.Yang@...iatek.com>
To: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Yong Wu (吴勇)
<Yong.Wu@...iatek.com>, "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "krzk@...nel.org"
<krzk@...nel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Add SMI reset and
clamp for MT8188
On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 15:42 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> On 30/04/2025 11:45, Friday Yang wrote:
> > From: "Friday Yang" <friday.yang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Add 'resets' and 'reset-names' properties for SMI LARBs to support
> > SMI reset operations.
> > On the MediaTek platform, some SMI LARBs are directly connected to
> > the SMI Common, while others are connected to the SMI Sub-Common,
> > which in turn is connected to the SMI Common. The hardware block
> > diagram can be described as follows.
> >
> > SMI-Common(Smart Multimedia Interface Common)
> > |
> > +----------------+------------------+
> > | | |
> > | | |
> > | | |
> > | | |
> > | | |
> > larb0 SMI-Sub-Common0 SMI-Sub-Common1
> > | | | | |
> > larb1 larb2 larb3 larb7 larb9
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Friday Yang <friday.yang@...iatek.com>
> > Tested-by: Friday Yang <friday.yang@...iatek.com>
>
> That's not possible. Otherwise explain me how do you test bindings
> (and
> using static checkers is not testing).
>
>
You are right, I just used static check scripts to test this patch on
my local server. I will remove this tag in the new version.
> > Reviewed-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
>
> Where? Provide lore link. That's a v7 so I expect all your work to be
> done public.
>
>
This tag should be removed too. He just reviewed this patch in our
internal gerrit and did not reply in the public way.
Apology for the miss.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists