[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAQKjZPNh=r5xf7X_R58VhuKz61vVGO83Oe9KsA1m_nJ1OuMLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:55:09 +0900
From: Inki Dae <daeinki@...il.com>
To: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: add flag to control
header FIFO wait
2025년 7월 7일 (월) 오전 3:26, Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>님이 작성:
>
> Exynos7870's DSIM device doesn't require waiting for the header FIFO
> during a MIPI DSI transfer. Add a flag in the driver data in order to
> control said behavior.
I will merge this patch as-is and just sharing the following comments
purely for reference (for other Exynos DRM contributors).
This patch likely needs follow-up improvements in conjunction with
Marek’s earlier patch (commit-id:
15f389da11257b806da75a070cfa41ca0cc15aae). I’m unable to verify this
at the moment because the SoC Technical Reference Manual (TRM)
documentation I have is incomplete.
Based on these two patches, we should plan for future code
improvements that account for two scenarios:
- The header FIFO must be waited for.
- The header FIFO does not need to be waited for.
Currently, this is handled via driver data using the
has_broken_fifoctrl_emptyhdr and wait_for_hdr_fifo flags. If the
handling of this behavior changes in newer Exynos SoCs, this approach
may become confusing or lead to inconsistencies.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index dca3939dd99fa07aee309067b93e652bc9a9b78f..84af24171b6856cbcf95b9077b997ee587fc0409 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ static const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data exynos3_dsi_driver_data = {
> .has_clklane_stop = 1,
> .num_clks = 2,
> .max_freq = 1000,
> + .wait_for_hdr_fifo = 1,
> .wait_for_reset = 1,
> .num_bits_resol = 11,
> .pll_p_offset = 13,
> @@ -438,6 +439,7 @@ static const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data exynos4_dsi_driver_data = {
> .has_clklane_stop = 1,
> .num_clks = 2,
> .max_freq = 1000,
> + .wait_for_hdr_fifo = 1,
> .wait_for_reset = 1,
> .num_bits_resol = 11,
> .pll_p_offset = 13,
> @@ -456,6 +458,7 @@ static const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data exynos5_dsi_driver_data = {
> .has_legacy_status_reg = 1,
> .num_clks = 2,
> .max_freq = 1000,
> + .wait_for_hdr_fifo = 1,
> .wait_for_reset = 1,
> .num_bits_resol = 11,
> .pll_p_offset = 13,
> @@ -474,6 +477,7 @@ static const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data exynos5433_dsi_driver_data = {
> .has_clklane_stop = 1,
> .num_clks = 5,
> .max_freq = 1500,
> + .wait_for_hdr_fifo = 1,
> .wait_for_reset = 0,
> .num_bits_resol = 12,
> .pll_p_offset = 13,
> @@ -492,6 +496,7 @@ static const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data exynos5422_dsi_driver_data = {
> .has_clklane_stop = 1,
> .num_clks = 2,
> .max_freq = 1500,
> + .wait_for_hdr_fifo = 1,
> .wait_for_reset = 1,
> .num_bits_resol = 12,
> .pll_p_offset = 13,
> @@ -510,6 +515,7 @@ static const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data imx8mm_dsi_driver_data = {
> .has_clklane_stop = 1,
> .num_clks = 2,
> .max_freq = 2100,
> + .wait_for_hdr_fifo = 1,
> .wait_for_reset = 0,
> .num_bits_resol = 12,
> /*
> @@ -1117,6 +1123,7 @@ static void samsung_dsim_send_to_fifo(struct samsung_dsim *dsi,
> {
> struct device *dev = dsi->dev;
> struct mipi_dsi_packet *pkt = &xfer->packet;
> + const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data *driver_data = dsi->driver_data;
> const u8 *payload = pkt->payload + xfer->tx_done;
> u16 length = pkt->payload_length - xfer->tx_done;
> bool first = !xfer->tx_done;
> @@ -1157,9 +1164,11 @@ static void samsung_dsim_send_to_fifo(struct samsung_dsim *dsi,
> return;
>
> reg = get_unaligned_le32(pkt->header);
> - if (samsung_dsim_wait_for_hdr_fifo(dsi)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "waiting for header FIFO timed out\n");
> - return;
> + if (driver_data->wait_for_hdr_fifo) {
> + if (samsung_dsim_wait_for_hdr_fifo(dsi)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "waiting for header FIFO timed out\n");
> + return;
> + }
> }
>
> if (NEQV(xfer->flags & MIPI_DSI_MSG_USE_LPM,
> diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h b/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
> index f0c1e5c5ed490afe0bcfd06830f52471710b29ea..62c07952bd00f9c2c287a6a998f0e243dd4032a9 100644
> --- a/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
> +++ b/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct samsung_dsim_driver_data {
> unsigned int num_clks;
> unsigned int min_freq;
> unsigned int max_freq;
> + unsigned int wait_for_hdr_fifo;
> unsigned int wait_for_reset;
> unsigned int num_bits_resol;
> unsigned int pll_p_offset;
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists