[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250729085336.GG402218@unreal>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:53:36 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce p2pdma_provider structure
for cleaner abstraction
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:52:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 03:51:58PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 10:55:33AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > Please, see last patch in the series https://lore.kernel.org/all/aea452cc27ca9e5169f7279d7b524190c39e7260.1753274085.git.leonro@nvidia.com
> > > > It gives me a way to call p2p code with stable pointer for whole BAR.
> > > >
> > >
> > > That simply can't work.
> >
> > Why not?
> >
> > That's the whole point of this, to remove struct page and use
> > something else as a handle for the p2p when doing the DMA API stuff.
>
> Because the struct page is the only thing that:
>
> a) dma-mapping works on
> b) is the only place we can discover the routing information, but also
> more importantly ensure that the underlying page is still present
> and the device is not hot unplugged, or in a very theoretical worst
> case replaced by something else.
It is correct in general case, but here we are talking about MMIO
memory, which is "connected" to device X and routing information is
stable.
Thanks
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists