[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edbc9a30-e0e7-4f89-9747-0770eb48e199@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:07:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Donghoon Yu <hoony.yu@...sung.com>, Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't
register as a sched_clock on arm64
On 29/07/2025 11:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 10:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches.
>>>
>>> On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>>>> So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is
>>>>> correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the
>>>>> misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various
>>>>> typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at
>>>>> it. Let me know if I got something wrong.
>>>>
>>>> If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove
>>>> the following patches:
>>>>
>>>> commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
>>>> commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section
>>>> mismatch from the module conversion
>>>>
>>>> Because of:
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2-
>>>> krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org/
>>>>
>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965-
>>>> aa05-05836466f81f@....fastmail.com/
>>
>> Grrr.
>>
>> I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to
>> pull and I revert them on top.
>
> That requires to revert 2798e90b4e09 ("arm64: exynos: Drop select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT")
> as well, no?
Yes, indeed, I missed that.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists