[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <920c5a0c-6ac2-49a1-8dbe-17761379765e@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:13:37 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Donghoon Yu <hoony.yu@...sung.com>, Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't
register as a sched_clock on arm64
On 29/07/2025 10:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches.
>>
>> On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>>> So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is
>>>> correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the
>>>> misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various
>>>> typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at
>>>> it. Let me know if I got something wrong.
>>>
>>> If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove
>>> the following patches:
>>>
>>> commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
>>> commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section
>>> mismatch from the module conversion
>>>
>>> Because of:
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2-
>>> krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org/
>>>
>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965-
>>> aa05-05836466f81f@....fastmail.com/
>
> Grrr.
>
> I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to
> pull and I revert them on top.
>
> Also please reset your clockevents branch so next does not have the
> conflicting SHAs
There is revert otherwise above [1]
Branch reset to v6.16-rc5
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists