[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250729115021.135bca64@batman.local.home>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:50:21 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux trace kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Namhyung Kim
<namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: tracing: Add documentation about eprobes
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 18:02:37 -0700
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > +Overview
> > +========
> > +
> > +Eprobes are dynamic events that are placed on existing events to eiter
>
> either
>
> > +dereference a field that is a pointer, or simply to limit what fields get
>
> (preference:) are
>
> > +recorded in the trace event.
> > +
> > +Eprobes depend on kprobe events so to enable this feature, build your kernel
>
> s/,/;/
OK.
> > + FETCHARG:TYPE : Set TYPE as the type of FETCHARG. Currently, basic types
> > + (u8/u16/u32/u64/s8/s16/s32/s64), hexadecimal types
> > + (x8/x16/x32/x64), VFS layer common type(%pd/%pD), "char",
> > + "string", "ustring", "symbol", "symstr" and bitfield are
>
> Should bitfield be quoted?
Hmm, probably. And we should fix kprobetrace.rst as that's where I copied it from.
> > +
> > +Attaching to dynamic events
> > +---------------------------
> > +
> > +Note that eprobes may attach to dynamic events as well as to normal events. It
>
> Don't need "Note that".
OK.
>
> > +may attach to a kprobe event, a synthetic event or a fprobe event. This is
>
> I would say: an fprobe event.
>
OK.
> > +
> > +Example 2
> > +---------
> > +
> > +If syscall events are not enabled but the raw syscall are (systemcall
>
> syscalls are (system call
>
> > +events are not normal events, but are created from the raw_syscall events
> > +within the kernel). In order to trace the openat system call, one can create
>
> ^^ not a complete sentence.
Ah, I'm thinking that "This example is for the case that syscall events
are not enabled..."
But it came out as the above. Will fix.
>
>
> > +an event probe on top of the raw_syscall event:
> > +::
> > +
> > + # cd /sys/kernel/tracing
> > + # cat events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/format
> > + name: sys_enter
> > + ID: 395
> > + format:
> > + field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
> > + field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
> > + field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
> > + field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
> > +
> > + field:long id; offset:8; size:8; signed:1;
> > + field:unsigned long args[6]; offset:16; size:48; signed:0;
> > +
> > + print fmt: "NR %ld (%lx, %lx, %lx, %lx, %lx, %lx)", REC->id, REC->args[0], REC->args[1], REC->args[2], REC->args[3], REC->args[4], REC->args[5]
> > +
> > +From the source code, the sys_openat() has:
> > +::
> > +
> > + int sys_openat(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags, mode_t mode)
> > + {
> > + return my_syscall4(__NR_openat, dirfd, path, flags, mode);
> > + }
> > +
> > +The path is the second parameter, and that is what is wanted.
>
> s/wanted/want/
Really? That sounds funny to me:
The path is the second parameter and that is what is want.
??
>
> > +::
> > +
> > + # echo 'e:openat raw_syscalls.sys_enter nr=$id filename=+8($args):ustring' >> dynamic_events
> > +
> > +This is being run on x86_64 where the word size is 8 bytes and the openat
> > +systemcall __NR_openat is set at 257.
>
> system call
OK.
> > +The filename shows "(fault)". This is likely because the filename has not been
> > +pulled into memory yet and currently trace events cannot fault in memory that
> > +is not present. When a eprobe tries to read memory that has not been faulted
>
> an eprobe
OK.
> > +Now that the address of the filename has been passed to the end of the
> > +systemcall, create another eprobe to attach to the exit event to show the
>
> system call,
OK.
>
> Thanks for the new documentation.
>
It was a long time coming :-p
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists