linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250730191101.7e6203f21b94c3f932fa8348@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:11:01 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark
 Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
 <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Memory Management List
 <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config
 option

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:27:08 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:

> Hi Steven,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next]
> [also build test ERROR on lwn/docs-next akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.16 next-20250729]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-Have-eprobes-have-their-own-config-option/20250730-001958
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250729161912.056641407%40kernel.org
> patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config option
> config: xtensa-randconfig-002-20250730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507301452.JPAcMvT0-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507301452.JPAcMvT0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507301452.JPAcMvT0-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    kernel/trace/trace_probe.c: In function 'parse_probe_arg':
> >> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c:1105:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'regs_query_register_offset'; did you mean 'ftrace_regs_query_register_offset'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     1105 |                 ret = regs_query_register_offset(arg + 1);
>          |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                       ftrace_regs_query_register_offset
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


Interesting, this find another issue. Since this is provided by
CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS, we need to fix CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS depending
on HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API.

diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
index a3f35c7d83b6..cd239240b0ef 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config DYNAMIC_EVENTS
        def_bool n
 
 config PROBE_EVENTS
+       depends on HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
        def_bool n
 
 config BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>