| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250730091727.7b3a8b96@gandalf.local.home> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:17:27 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config option On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:11:01 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote: > Interesting, this find another issue. Since this is provided by > CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS, we need to fix CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS depending > on HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API. > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig > index a3f35c7d83b6..cd239240b0ef 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig > +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig > @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config DYNAMIC_EVENTS > def_bool n > > config PROBE_EVENTS > + depends on HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API > def_bool n > > config BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE OK, I'll send a v2. Did you want to take this in the tracing pull request? I see you already did the probe pull request. -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists