[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250730225722.c88d2dbd3dfa07310de7edd4@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:57:22 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu
Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Memory Management List
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config
option
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:17:27 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:11:01 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Interesting, this find another issue. Since this is provided by
> > CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS, we need to fix CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS depending
> > on HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > index a3f35c7d83b6..cd239240b0ef 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config DYNAMIC_EVENTS
> > def_bool n
> >
> > config PROBE_EVENTS
> > + depends on HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> > def_bool n
> >
> > config BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE
>
> OK, I'll send a v2.
>
> Did you want to take this in the tracing pull request?
>
> I see you already did the probe pull request.
Ah, I thought this was for the next one... (but I think it is a kind of bugfix?)
Thank you,
>
> -- Steve
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists