linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250730100155.268d2442@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:01:55 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu
 Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Memory Management List
 <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Have eprobes have their own config
 option

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:57:22 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> > I see you already did the probe pull request.  
> 
> Ah, I thought this was for the next one... (but I think it is a kind of bugfix?)

Yeah, as its not adding eprobes, but just making it configurable.

But you haven't answered my question ;-)

Do you want to push it to Linus or should I?

I still have the trace/for-next to push (I've finished testing your last
"attribute" patch and now I'm just letting it simmer in linux-next before
doing the pull request). I can still add this to that one if you want.

-- Steve