[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01f2c5d5-6321-49af-b73c-6924f46d6646@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:44:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>, mani@...nel.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add reg and reg-names
On 30/07/2025 13:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> "extending" but you are not extending at all.
>>>
>>> Recent qcom patches love to break ABI and impact users. No.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> Regarding your concern about this being an incompatible change — could you please clarify what specific aspect you believe breaks compatibility?
>> From my side, I’ve carefully tested the patch and verified that it does not break any existing DTs. I ran the following command to validate against the schema:
>
>
> I missed that earlier list is not actually used for SM8550 and SM8650.
> The syntax is a bit confusing after looking only at diff, which probably
> means this binding is getting messy.
>
> I think binding should be just split the constraints are easier to follow.
I sent a patch for splitting the bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists