[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DBQBRYBV9YVN.35REJ1DIA06L7@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:54:34 +0200
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Shankari Anand" <shankari.ak0208@...il.com>
Cc: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "Maxime Ripard"
<mripard@...nel.org>, "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "David
Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, "Miguel
Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "Boqun
Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin"
<lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice
Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] rust: gpu: update ARef and AlwaysRefCounted imports
from sync::aref
On Thu Jul 31, 2025 at 3:59 PM CEST, Shankari Anand wrote:
>> Where is the rest of the series?
> So actually it's spread across various subsystems. I had given the
> notation (2/7) to have a count of the patches under the same effort.
> Apologies for the misinterpretation.
> But yes, recently Miguel suggested discontinuing using the notation
> but as I had sent the patch long back, I didn't resend it.
>
> If it is confusing, then I'll resend it without the series notation.
> But, this is basically a standalone patch.
Ok, did you send the other ones already? I don't see them anywhere.
NIT: Please don't top post. [1]
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#use-trimmed-interleaved-replies-in-email-discussions
Powered by blists - more mailing lists