lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPRMd3nQSyXB+K2Fcs7WJJmtY2F7sm8tFOD1PrkQyHgND=Ju1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 23:20:00 +0530
From: Shankari Anand <shankari.ak0208@...il.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] rust: gpu: update ARef and AlwaysRefCounted imports
 from sync::aref

On Thu Jul 31, 2025 at 14:54 UTC, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> Ok, did you send the other ones already? I don't see them anywhere.

The commit 07dad44aa9a9 ("rust: kernel: move ARef and AlwaysRefCounted
to sync::aref ") refers to the patch where ARef and AlwaysRefCounted
were moved into a different file. [1]
To update the call-sites accordingly, I was advised to split the
changes by subsystem so each patch could be reviewed and acked by the
respective maintainers. [2]
These patches are all part of that same effort, although they aren't
shown as a formal series since the subject lines vary to reflect the
specific files they touch. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

> NIT: Please don't top post. [1]

> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#use-trimmed-interleaved-replies-in-email-discussions

Apologies, I’ll make sure to follow the interleaved style.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=07dad44aa9a93b16af19e8609a10b241c352b440
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72=NSRMV_6UxXVgkebmWmbgN4i=sfRszr-G+x3W5A4DYOg@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250716090712.809750-1-shankari.ak0208@gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250716091158.812860-1-shankari.ak0208@gmail.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250716091827.816971-1-shankari.ak0208@gmail.com/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250717072724.14602-1-shankari.ak0208@gmail.com/
[7] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250717073108.14943-1-shankari.ak0208@gmail.com/



On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 8:24 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu Jul 31, 2025 at 3:59 PM CEST, Shankari Anand wrote:
> >> Where is the rest of the series?
> > So actually it's spread across various subsystems. I had given the
> > notation (2/7) to have a count of the patches under the same effort.
> > Apologies for the misinterpretation.
> > But yes, recently Miguel suggested discontinuing using the notation
> > but as I had sent the patch long back, I didn't resend it.
> >
> > If it is confusing, then I'll resend it without the series notation.
> > But, this is basically a standalone patch.
>
> Ok, did you send the other ones already? I don't see them anywhere.
>
> NIT: Please don't top post. [1]
>
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#use-trimmed-interleaved-replies-in-email-discussions

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ