[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIzIpbQOcxmWOwvs@lpieralisi>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:01:09 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@....com>,
Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Remove IRQD_RESEND_WHEN_IN_PROGRESS
for ITS IRQs
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:58:20 +0100,
> Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > GICv5 LPI interrupts have an active state hence they cannot retrigger
> > while the IRQ is being handled.
> >
> > Therefore setting IRQD_RESEND_WHEN_IN_PROGRESS for GICv5 ITS
> > interrupts provides no benefit and it is useless (and confusing),
> > it solves an issue that cannot happen.
>
> This doesn't read very well. How about:
>
> "Therefore, setting the IRQD_RESEND_WHEN_IN_PROGRESS flag on LPIs
> is pointless, as the situation this flag caters for cannot happen".
Yes it is clearer, I can respin a v2 unless Thomas can update the log
please while applying it ? Just let me know.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
> > index 340640fdbdf6..9290ac741949 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
> > @@ -973,7 +973,6 @@ static int gicv5_its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int vi
> > irqd = irq_get_irq_data(virq + i);
> > irqd_set_single_target(irqd);
> > irqd_set_affinity_on_activate(irqd);
> > - irqd_set_resend_when_in_progress(irqd);
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> >
>
> With that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists