linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rust: list: remove nonexistent insert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mT=Eee3NwxxmysBu4iP6LYuHA2NckrKKVY=qQSSK12=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 23:31:10 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>
Cc: ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, 
	gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org, 
	a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, 
	dakr@...nel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: list: remove nonexistent insert_at() from the comments

On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> The insert_at() method was never introduced in the code. Remove it from
> the comments to avoid confusion.

Hmm... I am not sure what you mean -- `insert_at()` is an example
function, used in the example itself.

Why would we remove that one, and not the others in the example, e.g.
`remove_all`?

Cheers,
Miguel