[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250803094202.3bf0f38c.zhiw@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 09:42:02 +0300
From: Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
CC: <ojeda@...nel.org>, <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<gary@...yguo.net>, <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <lossin@...nel.org>,
<a.hindborg@...nel.org>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
<dakr@...nel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: list: remove nonexistent insert_at() from the
comments
On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 23:31:10 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com> wrote:
> >
> > The insert_at() method was never introduced in the code. Remove it
> > from the comments to avoid confusion.
>
> Hmm... I am not sure what you mean -- `insert_at()` is an example
> function, used in the example itself.
>
> Why would we remove that one, and not the others in the example, e.g.
> `remove_all`?
>
Oh, you are right, I lost the context when reading the code and
hacking the list routines at late night.
Please drop this.
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists