lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175412405784.2356345.13601254650114566601@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 09:40:57 +0100
From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Nicholas Roth <nicholas@...hemail.net>, Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@...tlin.com>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev, Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@...tlin.com>, ~diederik/pine64-discuss@...ts.sr.ht, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: describe I2c Bus 1 and IMX258 world camera on PinePhone Pro

Hi Olivier,

I'm very pleased to see this support getting upstreamed!

Quoting Olivier Benjamin (2025-06-20 16:21:34)
> Add the description of the rear/world camera (IMX258) on the PinePhone Pro
> to the device dts file.
> It receives commands on the I2C Bus 1 at address 0x1a and transmits data
> over CSI-MIPI.
> 
> The I2C address for IMX258 can be found in the IMX258-0AQH5 Software
> Reference Manual, page 24, section 2.3.1: 0b0011010 = 0x1a.
> Section 3 indicates the module has 4 pairs of data lines. While 4-lane
> mode is nominal, 2-lane mode should also be supported.
> 
> The pin muxing info was extracted from the PinePhone Pro schematic v1.0
> as well as the RK3399 datasheet revision 1.8.
> 
> Table 2-3 in section 2.8 of the RK3399 datasheet contains the mapping
> of IO functions for the SoC pins. Page 52 shows GPIO1_A0, page 54 shows
> GPIO2_D4.
> 
> For I2C power, the PinePhone Pro schematic page 11 quadrants A4 and A5:
> RK3399_J.AA8 and RK3399_J.Y8 get power from vcaa1v8_codec, so turn it on
> 
> The IMX258 also uses the following regulators, expected by its driver:
>  - vana (2.8V analog), called AVDD2V8_DVP on P.18 q.C1 and derived from
>    VCC1V8_S3 on P.13 q.B2
>  - vdig (1.2V digital core), called DVDD_DVP on P.18 q.C1 and shown on
>    P.18 q.D3 to be equivalent to VCC1V2_DVP derived from VCC3V3_SYS on
>    P.13 q.B3. Note that this regulator's voltage is inconsistently
>    labeled either 1.2V or 1.5V
> 
> RK3399_J.AG1 is GPIO4_A1/I2C1_SDA, RK3399_J.Y6 is GPIO4_A2/I2C1_SCL
> This is the default pinctrl "i2c1_xfer" for i2c1 from rk3399-base.
> 
> For the reset (RESET) signal:
> page 11 quadrant D2             | p.18 q.C3-4 | p.18 q.C2
> RK3399_E.R25 -> GPIO1_A0 -> Camera_RST -> MIPI_RST0 -> IMX258.12
> 
> For the powerdown (PWDN) signal:
> page 11 quadrants B4-5          | p.18 q.C2
> RK3399_G.AF8 -> GPIO2_D4 -> DVP_PDN1_H -> IMX258.14
> 
> Helped-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
> Co-developed-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts     | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> index 04ba4c4565d0a205e2e46d7535c6a3190993621d..b335d044138b413359ba54269ab646142254a55f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ vcc3v3_sys: regulator-vcc3v3-sys {
>                 vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
>         };
>  
> +       avdd2v8_dvp: regulator-avdd2v8-dvp {
> +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +               regulator-name = "avdd2v8_dvp";
> +               regulator-always-on;
> +               regulator-boot-on;
> +               regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
> +               regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
> +               vin-supply = <&vcc3v3_sys>;
> +       };
> +
>         vcca1v8_s3: regulator-vcc1v8-s3 {
>                 compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>                 regulator-name = "vcca1v8_s3";
> @@ -136,6 +146,16 @@ vcc1v8_codec: regulator-vcc1v8-codec {
>                 vin-supply = <&vcc3v3_sys>;
>         };
>  
> +       vcc1v2_dvp: regulator-vcc1v2-dvp {
> +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +               regulator-name = "vcc1v2_dvp";
> +               regulator-always-on;
> +               regulator-boot-on;
> +               regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
> +               regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> +               vin-supply = <&vcca1v8_s3>;
> +       };
> +
>         wifi_pwrseq: sdio-wifi-pwrseq {
>                 compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
>                 clocks = <&rk818 1>;
> @@ -312,6 +332,8 @@ vcc3v0_touch: LDO_REG2 {
>  
>                         vcca1v8_codec: LDO_REG3 {
>                                 regulator-name = "vcca1v8_codec";
> +                               regulator-always-on;
> +                               regulator-boot-on;

Is regulator-boot-on needed when regulator-always-on is set? Doesn't
-always-on take precedence and ensure it's enabled if it's not on
anyway?

It seems odd to have (need?) both ...? but I'm no DT expert on this part
- it just stands out to me.


>                                 regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
>                                 regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
>                         };
> @@ -420,6 +442,45 @@ regulator-state-mem {
>         };
>  };
>  
> +&i2c1 {
> +       clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +       pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_xfer &cif_clkouta>;
> +       assigned-clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>;
> +       assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
> +       status = "okay";
> +
> +       wcam: camera@1a {
> +               compatible = "sony,imx258";
> +               reg = <0x1a>;
> +               clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>; /* MIPI_MCLK0, derived from CIF_CLKO */
> +               pinctrl-names = "default";
> +               pinctrl-0 = <&camera_rst>;
> +               /* Note: both cameras also depend on vcca1v8_codec to power the I2C bus. */

Should that be represented by the i2c1 bus then?

> +               vif-supply = <&vcc1v8_dvp>;
> +               vana-supply = <&avdd2v8_dvp>;
> +               vdig-supply = <&vcc1v2_dvp>; /* DVDD_DVP is the same as VCC1V2_DVP */
> +               reset-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +               orientation = <1>; /* V4L2_CAMERA_ORIENTATION_BACK */
> +               rotation = <270>;
> +               lens-focus = <&wcam_lens>;
> +
> +               port {
> +                       wcam_out: endpoint {
> +                               remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_wcam>;
> +                               data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
> +                               link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <636000000>;
> +                       };
> +               };
> +       };
> +
> +       wcam_lens: camera-lens@c {
> +               compatible = "dongwoon,dw9714";
> +               reg = <0x0c>;
> +               /* Same I2c bus as both cameras, depends on vcca1v8_codec for power. */
> +               vcc-supply = <&vcc1v8_dvp>;
> +       };
> +};
> +
>  &i2c3 {
>         i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <450>;
>         i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <15>;
> @@ -462,6 +523,28 @@ &io_domains {
>         status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&isp1 {
> +       status = "okay";
> +
> +       ports {
> +               port@0 {
> +                       mipi_in_wcam: endpoint@0 {
> +                               reg = <0>;
> +                               remote-endpoint = <&wcam_out>;
> +                               data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
> +                       };
> +               };
> +       };
> +};
> +
> +&mipi_dphy_rx0 {
> +       status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&isp1_mmu {
> +       status = "okay";
> +};
> +
>  &mipi_dsi {
>         status = "okay";
>         clock-master;
> @@ -495,6 +578,10 @@ mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
>         };
>  };
>  
> +&mipi_dsi1 {
> +       status = "okay";
> +};
> +

Is this an unrelated change? The Camera should be on CSI - not DSI?

>  &pmu_io_domains {
>         pmu1830-supply = <&vcc_1v8>;
>         status = "okay";
> @@ -507,6 +594,12 @@ pwrbtn_pin: pwrbtn-pin {
>                 };
>         };
>  
> +       camera {
> +               camera_rst_l: camera-rst-l {
> +                       rockchip,pins = <1 RK_PA0 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> +               };
> +       };
> +
>         leds {
>                 red_led_pin: red-led-pin {
>                         rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PD2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> 
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ