[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175412502069.2356345.9219250797238353702@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 09:57:00 +0100
From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Nicholas Roth <nicholas@...hemail.net>, Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@...tlin.com>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev, Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@...tlin.com>, ~diederik/pine64-discuss@...ts.sr.ht, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: describe I2c Bus 1 and IMX258 world camera on PinePhone Pro
Quoting Kieran Bingham (2025-08-02 09:40:57)
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I'm very pleased to see this support getting upstreamed!
>
> Quoting Olivier Benjamin (2025-06-20 16:21:34)
> > Add the description of the rear/world camera (IMX258) on the PinePhone Pro
> > to the device dts file.
> > It receives commands on the I2C Bus 1 at address 0x1a and transmits data
> > over CSI-MIPI.
> >
> > The I2C address for IMX258 can be found in the IMX258-0AQH5 Software
> > Reference Manual, page 24, section 2.3.1: 0b0011010 = 0x1a.
> > Section 3 indicates the module has 4 pairs of data lines. While 4-lane
> > mode is nominal, 2-lane mode should also be supported.
> >
> > The pin muxing info was extracted from the PinePhone Pro schematic v1.0
> > as well as the RK3399 datasheet revision 1.8.
> >
> > Table 2-3 in section 2.8 of the RK3399 datasheet contains the mapping
> > of IO functions for the SoC pins. Page 52 shows GPIO1_A0, page 54 shows
> > GPIO2_D4.
> >
> > For I2C power, the PinePhone Pro schematic page 11 quadrants A4 and A5:
> > RK3399_J.AA8 and RK3399_J.Y8 get power from vcaa1v8_codec, so turn it on
> >
> > The IMX258 also uses the following regulators, expected by its driver:
> > - vana (2.8V analog), called AVDD2V8_DVP on P.18 q.C1 and derived from
> > VCC1V8_S3 on P.13 q.B2
> > - vdig (1.2V digital core), called DVDD_DVP on P.18 q.C1 and shown on
> > P.18 q.D3 to be equivalent to VCC1V2_DVP derived from VCC3V3_SYS on
> > P.13 q.B3. Note that this regulator's voltage is inconsistently
> > labeled either 1.2V or 1.5V
> >
> > RK3399_J.AG1 is GPIO4_A1/I2C1_SDA, RK3399_J.Y6 is GPIO4_A2/I2C1_SCL
> > This is the default pinctrl "i2c1_xfer" for i2c1 from rk3399-base.
> >
> > For the reset (RESET) signal:
> > page 11 quadrant D2 | p.18 q.C3-4 | p.18 q.C2
> > RK3399_E.R25 -> GPIO1_A0 -> Camera_RST -> MIPI_RST0 -> IMX258.12
> >
> > For the powerdown (PWDN) signal:
> > page 11 quadrants B4-5 | p.18 q.C2
> > RK3399_G.AF8 -> GPIO2_D4 -> DVP_PDN1_H -> IMX258.14
> >
> > Helped-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
> > Co-developed-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> > index 04ba4c4565d0a205e2e46d7535c6a3190993621d..b335d044138b413359ba54269ab646142254a55f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> > @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ vcc3v3_sys: regulator-vcc3v3-sys {
> > vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
> > };
> >
> > + avdd2v8_dvp: regulator-avdd2v8-dvp {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "avdd2v8_dvp";
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc3v3_sys>;
> > + };
> > +
> > vcca1v8_s3: regulator-vcc1v8-s3 {
> > compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > regulator-name = "vcca1v8_s3";
> > @@ -136,6 +146,16 @@ vcc1v8_codec: regulator-vcc1v8-codec {
> > vin-supply = <&vcc3v3_sys>;
> > };
> >
> > + vcc1v2_dvp: regulator-vcc1v2-dvp {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "vcc1v2_dvp";
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> > + vin-supply = <&vcca1v8_s3>;
> > + };
> > +
> > wifi_pwrseq: sdio-wifi-pwrseq {
> > compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
> > clocks = <&rk818 1>;
> > @@ -312,6 +332,8 @@ vcc3v0_touch: LDO_REG2 {
> >
> > vcca1v8_codec: LDO_REG3 {
> > regulator-name = "vcca1v8_codec";
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
>
> Is regulator-boot-on needed when regulator-always-on is set? Doesn't
> -always-on take precedence and ensure it's enabled if it's not on
> anyway?
>
> It seems odd to have (need?) both ...? but I'm no DT expert on this part
> - it just stands out to me.
>
>
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > };
> > @@ -420,6 +442,45 @@ regulator-state-mem {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > +&i2c1 {
> > + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_xfer &cif_clkouta>;
> > + assigned-clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>;
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + wcam: camera@1a {
> > + compatible = "sony,imx258";
> > + reg = <0x1a>;
> > + clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>; /* MIPI_MCLK0, derived from CIF_CLKO */
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&camera_rst>;
> > + /* Note: both cameras also depend on vcca1v8_codec to power the I2C bus. */
>
> Should that be represented by the i2c1 bus then?
>
> > + vif-supply = <&vcc1v8_dvp>;
> > + vana-supply = <&avdd2v8_dvp>;
> > + vdig-supply = <&vcc1v2_dvp>; /* DVDD_DVP is the same as VCC1V2_DVP */
> > + reset-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + orientation = <1>; /* V4L2_CAMERA_ORIENTATION_BACK */
> > + rotation = <270>;
> > + lens-focus = <&wcam_lens>;
> > +
> > + port {
> > + wcam_out: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_wcam>;
> > + data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
> > + link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <636000000>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + wcam_lens: camera-lens@c {
> > + compatible = "dongwoon,dw9714";
> > + reg = <0x0c>;
> > + /* Same I2c bus as both cameras, depends on vcca1v8_codec for power. */
> > + vcc-supply = <&vcc1v8_dvp>;
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > &i2c3 {
> > i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <450>;
> > i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <15>;
> > @@ -462,6 +523,28 @@ &io_domains {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > +&isp1 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + ports {
> > + port@0 {
> > + mipi_in_wcam: endpoint@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + remote-endpoint = <&wcam_out>;
> > + data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&mipi_dphy_rx0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&isp1_mmu {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > &mipi_dsi {
> > status = "okay";
> > clock-master;
> > @@ -495,6 +578,10 @@ mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > +&mipi_dsi1 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
>
> Is this an unrelated change? The Camera should be on CSI - not DSI?
Never mind - it seems these are probably already applied ;-)
--
Kieran
>
> > &pmu_io_domains {
> > pmu1830-supply = <&vcc_1v8>;
> > status = "okay";
> > @@ -507,6 +594,12 @@ pwrbtn_pin: pwrbtn-pin {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + camera {
> > + camera_rst_l: camera-rst-l {
> > + rockchip,pins = <1 RK_PA0 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > leds {
> > red_led_pin: red-led-pin {
> > rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PD2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> >
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-rockchip mailing list
> > Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists