[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jqgnivkquty3gdhhedbx3vub7wguhuxyorelkpvwhu6r3mfvzm@q7voouptegpt>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:15:44 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: bsdhenrymartin@...il.com
Cc: huntazhang@...cent.com, jitxie@...cent.com, landonsun@...cent.com,
bryan-bt.tan@...adcom.com, vishnu.dasa@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Henry Martin <bsdhenryma@...cent.com>,
TCS Robot <tcs_robot@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] VSOCK: fix Out-of-Bounds Read in
vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue()
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 02:20:41PM +0800, bsdhenrymartin@...il.com wrote:
>From: Henry Martin <bsdhenryma@...cent.com>
>
>vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue lack of buffer length validation before
>accessing `vmci_datagram` header.
>
>Trigger Path:
>1. Attacker sends a datagram with length < sizeof(struct
> vmci_datagram).
How?
>2. `skb_recv_datagram()` returns the malformed sk_buff (skb->len <
> sizeof(struct vmci_datagram)).
The sk_buff is queued by vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb() calling
sk_receive_skb(). And It is allocated with this code:
#define VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE sizeof(struct vmci_datagram)
#define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size)
static int vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb(void *data, struct vmci_datagram *dg)
{
...
size = VMCI_DG_SIZE(dg);
/* Attach the packet to the socket's receive queue as an sk_buff. */
skb = alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
...
skb_put(skb, size);
...
}
So I don't understand what this patch is fixing...
>3. Code casts skb->data to struct vmci_datagram *dg without verifying
> skb->len.
>4. Accessing `dg->payload_size` (Line: `payload_len =
> dg->payload_size;`) reads out-of-bounds memory.
>
>Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
>Reported-by: TCS Robot <tcs_robot@...cent.com>
Please fix your robot and also check your patches.
This is the second no-sense patch from you I reviewed today, I'll start
to ignore if you continue.
Stefano
>Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenryma@...cent.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>index 7eccd6708d66..0be605e19b2e 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>@@ -1749,6 +1749,11 @@ static int vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> if (!skb)
> return err;
>
>+ if (skb->len < sizeof(struct vmci_datagram)) {
>+ err = -EINVAL;
>+ goto out;
>+ }
>+
> dg = (struct vmci_datagram *)skb->data;
> if (!dg)
> /* err is 0, meaning we read zero bytes. */
>--
>2.41.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists