[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a22beba8-17ae-4c40-88f0-d4027d17fdbc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 13:46:28 +0100
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, hannes@...xchg.org, baohua@...nel.org,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, riel@...riel.com, ziy@...dia.com,
laoar.shao@...il.com, dev.jain@....com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
npache@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, jannh@...gle.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, sj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] selftests: prctl: introduce tests for disabling
THPs completely
On 05/08/2025 13:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> +FIXTURE_SETUP(prctl_thp_disable_completely)
>> +{
>> + if (!thp_available())
>> + SKIP(return, "Transparent Hugepages not available\n");
>> +
>> + self->pmdsize = read_pmd_pagesize();
>> + if (!self->pmdsize)
>> + SKIP(return, "Unable to read PMD size\n");
>> +
>> + thp_save_settings();
>> + thp_read_settings(&self->settings);
>> + self->settings.thp_enabled = variant->thp_policy;
>> + self->settings.hugepages[sz2ord(self->pmdsize, getpagesize())].enabled = THP_INHERIT;
>
> Oh, one more thing: should we set all other sizes also to THP_INHERIT or (for simplicity) THP_NEVER?
>
hmm do we need to? I am hoping that we should always get the PMD size THP no matter what the policy
for others is in the scenario we have?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists