[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e608f766-8750-4781-bd23-8fa95b6d683a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 14:55:27 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, hannes@...xchg.org, baohua@...nel.org,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, riel@...riel.com, ziy@...dia.com,
laoar.shao@...il.com, dev.jain@....com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
npache@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, jannh@...gle.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, sj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] selftests: prctl: introduce tests for disabling
THPs completely
On 05.08.25 14:46, Usama Arif wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/2025 13:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> +FIXTURE_SETUP(prctl_thp_disable_completely)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!thp_available())
>>> + SKIP(return, "Transparent Hugepages not available\n");
>>> +
>>> + self->pmdsize = read_pmd_pagesize();
>>> + if (!self->pmdsize)
>>> + SKIP(return, "Unable to read PMD size\n");
>>> +
>>> + thp_save_settings();
>>> + thp_read_settings(&self->settings);
>>> + self->settings.thp_enabled = variant->thp_policy;
>>> + self->settings.hugepages[sz2ord(self->pmdsize, getpagesize())].enabled = THP_INHERIT;
>>
>> Oh, one more thing: should we set all other sizes also to THP_INHERIT or (for simplicity) THP_NEVER?
>>
>
> hmm do we need to? I am hoping that we should always get the PMD size THP no matter what the policy
> for others is in the scenario we have?
Assuming 64K is set to "always", couldn't it mislead us in the
"madvise"/"never" test cases in some scenarios?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists