linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] implement ww_mutex abstraction for the Rust tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250805165014.1766f8dd@nimda.home>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:50:14 +0300
From: Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
 a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
 dakr@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
 longman@...hat.com, felipe_life@...e.com, daniel@...lak.dev,
 bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] implement ww_mutex abstraction for the Rust tree

On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:41:43 -0300
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com> wrote:

> Hi Onur,
> 
> > On 5 Aug 2025, at 06:08, Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 11:15:07 -0300
> > Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Btw, I can also try to implement a proof of concept, so long as
> >> people agree that this approach makes sense.
> > 
> > It's not necessary to provide a full P.o.C but a small
> > demonstration of the kind of ww_mutex API you would prefer would be
> > helpful. Seeing a few sample Rust use-cases (especially in
> > comparison to existing C implementations) would give a clearer
> > picture for me.
> > 
> > At the moment, the implementation is just a wrapper ([1]) around
> > the C ww_mutex with no additional functionality, mostly because we
> > don't have a solid consensus on the API design yet (we had some
> > ideas about Tuple based approach, but seems like that isn't going
> > to be useful for most of the ww_mutex users).
> > 
> > [1]: https://github.com/onur-ozkan/linux/commits/673e01a9c309c
> > 
> >> By the way, dri-devel seems to not be on cc? Added them now.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Onur
> > 
> 
> This topic is on my TODO for this week.
> 
> — Daniel

Awesome, thank you for doing it. :)

Regards,
Onur