[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9027aa89-b3b2-46c8-8338-6c37f1c5b97a@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:25:19 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Alexander Viro
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] procfs: add PROCFS_GET_PID_NAMESPACE ioctl
On 8/4/25 10:45 PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> /proc has historically had very opaque semantics about PID namespaces,
> which is a little unfortunate for container runtimes and other programs
> that deal with switching namespaces very often. One common issue is that
> of converting between PIDs in the process's namespace and PIDs in the
> namespace of /proc.
>
> In principle, it is possible to do this today by opening a pidfd with
> pidfd_open(2) and then looking at /proc/self/fdinfo/$n (which will
> contain a PID value translated to the pid namespace associated with that
> procfs superblock). However, allocating a new file for each PID to be
> converted is less than ideal for programs that may need to scan procfs,
> and it is generally useful for userspace to be able to finally get this
> information from procfs.
>
> So, add a new API to get the pid namespace of a procfs instance, in the
> form of an ioctl(2) you can call on the root directory of said procfs.
> The returned file descriptor will have O_CLOEXEC set. This acts as a
> sister feature to the new "pidns" mount option, finally allowing
> userspace full control of the pid namespaces associated with procfs
> instances.
>
> The permission model for this is a bit looser than that of the "pidns"
> mount option (and also setns(2)) because /proc/1/ns/pid provides the
> same information, so as long as you have access to that magic-link (or
> something equivalently reasonable such as being in an ancestor pid
> namespace) it makes sense to allow userspace to grab a handle. Ideally
> we would check for ptrace-read access against all processes in the pidns
> (which is very likely to be true for at least one process, as
> SUID_DUMP_DISABLE is cleared on exec(2) and is rarely set by most
> programs), but this would obviously not scale.
>
> setns(2) will still have their own permission checks, so being able to
> open a pidns handle doesn't really provide too many other capabilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 4 +++
> fs/proc/root.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> index 0bd678a4a10e..68e65e6d7d6b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> @@ -435,8 +435,12 @@ typedef int __bitwise __kernel_rwf_t;
> RWF_APPEND | RWF_NOAPPEND | RWF_ATOMIC |\
> RWF_DONTCACHE)
>
> +/* This matches XSDFEC_MAGIC, so we need to allocate subvalues carefully. */
> #define PROCFS_IOCTL_MAGIC 'f'
>
> +/* procfs root ioctls */
> +#define PROCFS_GET_PID_NAMESPACE _IO(PROCFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32)
Since the _IO() nr here is 32, Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
should be updated like:
-'f' 00-0F linux/fs.h conflict!
+'f' 00-1F linux/fs.h conflict!
(17 is already used for PROCFS_IOCTL_MAGIC somewhere else, so that probably should
have update the Doc/rst file.)
> +
> /* Pagemap ioctl */
> #define PAGEMAP_SCAN _IOWR(PROCFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 16, struct pm_scan_arg)
>
>
Thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists