linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250806102501.75104-1-safinaskar@zohomail.com>
Date: Wed,  6 Aug 2025 13:25:01 +0300
From: Askar Safin <safinaskar@...omail.com>
To: cyphar@...har.com
Cc: amir73il@...il.com,
	brauner@...nel.org,
	corbet@....net,
	jack@...e.cz,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	luto@...capital.net,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option

> I just realised that we probably also want to support FSCONFIG_SET_PATH

I just checked kernel code. Indeed nobody uses FSCONFIG_SET_PATH. Moreover, fsparam_path macro is present since 5.1. And for all this time nobody used it. So, let's just remove FSCONFIG_SET_PATH. Nobody used it, so this will not break anything.

If you okay with that, I can submit patch, removing it.

--
Askar Safin