[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh+bnqPjL=9oq3uEkyZ7WB8=F_QMOHsGjHLj98oYk-X3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 04:11:09 +0300
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Netdev Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Armando Budianto <sprite@...weeb.org>, gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, John Ernberg <john.ernberg@...ia.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: usbnet: Fix the wrong netif_carrier_on() call placement
On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 at 01:40, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> And no, I didn't actually test that version, because I was hoping that
> somebody who actually knows this code better would pipe up.
Bah. Since I'm obviously horribly jetlagged, I decided to just test to
make sure I understand the code.
And yeah, the attached patch also fixes the problem for me and makes
more sense to me.
But again, it would be good to get comments from people who *actually*
know the code.
Linus
Download attachment "patch.diff" of type "application/x-patch" (956 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists