[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250806014417.19918-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 09:44:17 +0800
From: wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com>
To: ziy@...dia.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
brauner@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org,
david@...hat.com,
jannh@...gle.com,
liam.howlett@...cle.com,
lianux.mm@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
richard.weiyang@...il.com,
ryncsn@...il.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
sj@...nel.org,
vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: fix FORCE_READ to read input value correctly.
Hi Zi Yan, Lorenzo,
Thank you for the detailed discussion. I have been following the
thread closely and it has been very insightful.
Zi Yan's fix is excellent and I appreciate the rigorous analysis.
Lorenzo's feedback has also deepened my own understanding of the
subtleties around the FORCE_READ macro.
Out of curiosity, I also checked the `(void)` prefixing on Godbolt.
As Zi Yan concluded, the resulting assembly appears identical.
I will be happy to join any future discussions regarding the exact
behavior of volatile in this context.
For this patch, it's definitely LGTM from my side as well, so.
Reviewed-by:wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com>
Thanks,
wang lian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists