[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36bd2bb2-31c8-e38f-e420-407742ccc3cc@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 10:31:34 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@....com>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
<sstabellini@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <puranjay@...nel.org>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <mbenes@...e.cz>, <ryan.roberts@....com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <chenl311@...natelecom.cn>,
<anshuman.khandual@....com>, <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
<liaochang1@...wei.com>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <leitao@...ian.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled()
with regs_irqs_disabled()
On 2025/8/5 23:05, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>
>> The generic entry code expects architecture code to provide
>> regs_irqs_disabled(regs) function, but arm64 does not have this and
>> provides inerrupts_enabled(regs), which has the opposite polarity.
> Nit: "interrupts_enabled(regs)"
Good catch! thank you for the review.
>> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
>> relace arm64's interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() and
>> update its callers under arch/arm64.
>>
>> For the moment, a definition of interrupts_enabled() is provided for
>> the GICv3 driver. Once arch/arm implement regs_irqs_disabled(), this
>> can be removed.
>>
>> Delete the fast_interrupts_enabled() macro as it is unused and we
>> don't want any new users to show up.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>> ---
> Otherwise looks good to me !
> Reviewed-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@....com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists