[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250807050950.n76f4vtndgjnujbo@hu-mojha-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 10:39:50 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ath12k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Fix check
mdt_header_valid()
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 03:01:45PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 10:55:28PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > Firmware binaries may lack section headers, in which case
> > the e_shentsize field in the ELF header can be zero.
> >
> > Update mdt_header_valid() to correctly handle this scenario
> > by adjusting the validation logic accordingly.
> >
>
> As I replied earlier today on v1 (probably after you sent this), I've
> applied the patch I sent out earlier for this problem.
Sure, thank you.
-Mukesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists