[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e19849f2-4a39-4a09-b19e-cb4f291a2dc2@wiesinger.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 08:20:43 +0200
From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@...singer.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17
On 28.07.2025 17:14, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Schedule notes for users:
>
> I've been digging through the bug tracker and polling users to see what
> bugs are still outstanding, and - it's not much.
>
> So, the experimental label is coming off in 6.18.
>
> As always, if you do hit a bug, please report it.
>
I can now confirm that bcachefs is getting stable and the test cases
with intentionally data corruption (simulation of a real world case I
had) gets bcachefs back to a consistent state (after 2 runs of: bcachefs
fsck -f -y ${DEV}). That's a base requirement for a stable filesystem.
Version of bcachefs-tools is git
530e8ade4e6af7d152f4f79bf9f2b9dec6441f2b and kernel is
6.16.0-200.fc42.x86_64.
See for details, I made data corruption even worser with running the
destroy script 5x:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/aa613c37-153c-43e4-b68e-9d50744be7de@wiesinger.com/
Great work Kent and the other contributors.
Unfortunately btrfs can't be repaired to a consistent state with the
same testcase. I'd like to be that testcase fixed also for BTRFS as a
stable filesystem (versions: 6.16.0-200.fc42.x86_64, btrfs-progs v6.15,
-EXPERIMENTAL -INJECT -STATIC +LZO +ZSTD +UDEV +FSVERITY +ZONED
CRYPTO=libgcrypt).
(I reported that already far in the past on the mailing list, see here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/63f8866f-ceda-4228-b595-e37b016e7b1f@wiesinger.com/).
Thnx.
Ciao,
Gerhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists