linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aJo5vP_mfBn_vxSF@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:43:08 +0000
From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...gle.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	z00813676 <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs

On Aug 11 11:35, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 06-08-25, 17:19, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > So, do we have consensus that the idle check is acceptable as proposed?
> > (Just want to make sure this thread doesn't get lost given another thread
> > has forked off in this conversation).
> 
> I don't have any objections to this or a better solution to this.

Thanks Viresh! Beata, can we kindly move ahead with the idle
optimization (which is this series), while we continue discussions for
the "under load" scenarios on the other thread?

BR,