linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] mm/numa_memblks: Use pr_debug instead of printk(KERN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250811-numa-dbg-v2-1-7842aa2d4c41@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:13:54 +0530
From: pratyush.brahma@....qualcomm.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@....qualcomm.com>,
        Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/numa_memblks: Use pr_debug instead of
 printk(KERN_DEBUG)

From: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@....qualcomm.com>

Replace the direct usage of printk(KERN_DEBUG ...) with pr_debug(...) to
align with the consistent `pr_*` API usage within the file.

Reviewed-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@....qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Removed printk header as suggested by Joshua.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250808-numa-dbg-v1-1-2ddd1ec634aa@oss.qualcomm.com
---
 mm/numa_memblks.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index 541a99c4071a67e5b0ef66f4136dee268a880003..ed6fcfca057ab4c9a8aa26cd1929551b4ded4a5b 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 
 #include <linux/array_size.h>
 #include <linux/sort.h>
-#include <linux/printk.h>
 #include <linux/memblock.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
@@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
 		for (j = 0; j < cnt; j++)
 			numa_distance[i * cnt + j] = i == j ?
 				LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
-	printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", cnt);
+	pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", cnt);
 
 	return 0;
 }

---
base-commit: 479058002c32b77acac43e883b92174e22c4be2d
change-id: 20250808-numa-dbg-62a8b2092c56

Best regards,
-- 
Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@....qualcomm.com>