linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: Replace bouncing Analog emails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d68f4783-ffdd-4fda-8ae4-65a211f9ffb1@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:52:23 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: Replace bouncing Analog emails

On 11/08/2025 11:50, Nuno Sá wrote:
>>>> I don't know who from Analog should maintain these devices, so I chosen
>>>> author from Analog of one of last commits.
>>>>
>>>> Marcelo Schmitt, could you confirm that you are okay (or not) with this?  
>>>
>>> Nuno, Michael, other ADI folk.  Can someone confirm if we are making these Marcelo's
>>> problem?
>>>
>>
>> As amusing as it would be for me, I definitely can't pick this up without
>> some tags from ADI folk and Marcelo in particular!!
> 
> Normally in situations like this, it defaults to me but I'm happy if
> Marcelo is comfortable in assuming maintainership for these.
> 
> That said, I do think that for the adis* drivers it makes sense to be me.


Do you mean that adis16240.yaml should be for you?

Just to be clear: I have no clue who should be maintaining these. For
sure emails should not bounce...

Best regards,
Krzysztof