linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: Replace bouncing Analog emails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <n35dcx77xlk7liosc6qdef423cuawvykrbn557qj72k5enear2@2akn2l3btwab>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:06:51 +0100
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, 
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: Replace bouncing Analog emails

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 11:52:23AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/08/2025 11:50, Nuno Sá wrote:
> >>>> I don't know who from Analog should maintain these devices, so I chosen
> >>>> author from Analog of one of last commits.
> >>>>
> >>>> Marcelo Schmitt, could you confirm that you are okay (or not) with this?  
> >>>
> >>> Nuno, Michael, other ADI folk.  Can someone confirm if we are making these Marcelo's
> >>> problem?
> >>>
> >>
> >> As amusing as it would be for me, I definitely can't pick this up without
> >> some tags from ADI folk and Marcelo in particular!!
> > 
> > Normally in situations like this, it defaults to me but I'm happy if
> > Marcelo is comfortable in assuming maintainership for these.
> > 
> > That said, I do think that for the adis* drivers it makes sense to be me.
> 
> 
> Do you mean that adis16240.yaml should be for you?

Yes, and adis16480.yaml.

> 
> Just to be clear: I have no clue who should be maintaining these. For
> sure emails should not bounce...
>

Agreed! And thanks for doing this btw. For sure me (or someone else in
Analog) should have done it before.

Thanks!
- Nuno Sá
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof