lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175500352391.61648.4220468114741869188.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 13:58:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
 Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
 Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
 Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
 Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
 Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, 
 Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rust: regulator: relax a few constraints on
 Regulator<T>

On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:31:39 -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> This series implement two related changes to address a bit of an oversight
> on my end on the initial patch for the Regulator abstraction. Note that
> this is not a fix, as it just relaxes the constraints on the previous code
> as it is safe to do so.
> 
> Patch 1 removes some needless &mut self for functions that already provide
> their own locking on the C side.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] rust: regulator: remove needless &mut from member functions
      commit: f7fbf3091f4cc4133574852f655593e1613d1af0
[2/2] rust: regulator: implement Send and Sync for Regulator<T>
      commit: 9a200cbdb54349909a42b45379e792e4b39dd223

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ