[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a77525e-8ed9-40cb-9c56-053e38296906@lucifer.local>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 18:06:44 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, ryabinin.a.a@...il.com,
glider@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/kasan: make kasan=on|off take effect for all
three modes
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 09:27:02PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Firstly I _LOVE_ the term 'ifdeffery scope'. Fantastic :)
>
> Learned from upstream people with expertise on both english and kernel, :-)
:)
> After investigation, I keep the CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS ifdeffery scope out
> of CONFIG_KASAN scope. Otherwise, I need define the dummy
> kasan_hw_tags_enabled() function twice. I am personally not fan of the
> style. While if that is preferred in kernel, I can change it.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> ......
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> static inline bool kasan_hw_tags_enabled(void)
> {
> return kasan_enabled();
> }
> #else /* CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */
> static inline bool kasan_hw_tags_enabled(void)
> {
> return false;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */
> .....
> #else /* CONFIG_KASAN */
> static inline bool kasan_hw_tags_enabled(void)
> {
> return false;
> }
> #endif
>
This is fine, as CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS implies CONFIG_KASAN anyway.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists