linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aJup_fo6b6gNrGF0@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:54:21 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@...l.net>, admin@...inas.su,
	linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, list-bcachefs@...lthompson.net,
	malte.schroeder@...ip.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:45:48PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 02:38:26PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:31:53PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > If you're interested, is it time to do some spec quoting and language
> > > lawyering?
> > 
> > If you want to start or restart a thread on the block list specificaly
> > for that topic, then sure, happy to spec talk with you. But I don't want
> > to chat on this one. I just wanted to know what you were talking about
> > because the description seemed underhanded.
> 
> Not underhanded, just straightforward - I've seen the test data, and the
> spec seemed pretty clear to me...

  "the block layer developer who went on a four email rant where he,
   charitably, misread the spec or the patchset or both"

Please revisit the thread and let me know me if you still stand by that
description. I've no idea if you're talking about me or one of the other
block developers on it, but I frankly don't see anything resembling what
you're describing.