[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eby2jl7aidtbodivalgyha6w6pvesh6rgr765b2sr4vuv3z3r5@gspmak4tg4wu>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:57:05 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@...l.net>, admin@...inas.su,
linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
list-bcachefs@...lthompson.net, malte.schroeder@...ip.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 02:54:21PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:45:48PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 02:38:26PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:31:53PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > If you're interested, is it time to do some spec quoting and language
> > > > lawyering?
> > >
> > > If you want to start or restart a thread on the block list specificaly
> > > for that topic, then sure, happy to spec talk with you. But I don't want
> > > to chat on this one. I just wanted to know what you were talking about
> > > because the description seemed underhanded.
> >
> > Not underhanded, just straightforward - I've seen the test data, and the
> > spec seemed pretty clear to me...
>
> "the block layer developer who went on a four email rant where he,
> charitably, misread the spec or the patchset or both"
>
> Please revisit the thread and let me know me if you still stand by that
> description. I've no idea if you're talking about me or one of the other
> block developers on it, but I frankly don't see anything resembling what
> you're describing.
Well, since you asked, Christoph...
I want to say - no hard feelings, things being frosty between us goes
way back, and we've recently made efforts to work better together. But
that was pretty hard to respond to.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists