[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250812110343.6dd82e9f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:03:43 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>
Cc: ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the fsl tree
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:45:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 8b3da0519ae6 ("soc: fsl: qe: convert set_multiple() to returning an integer")
>
> This is commit
>
> 12702f0c3834 ("soc: fsl: qe: convert set_multiple() to returning an integer")
>
> in the arm-soc tree.
Since 8b3da0519ae6 is the only commit in the fsl tree and the
duplication is now causing a conflict due to another commit touching
the same file, you could just reset the fsl tree to v6.17-rc1.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists