[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d72bb0f7-8dc3-42ca-84d9-c74b4db02445@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:05:51 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] selftests: vDSO: fix -Wunitialized in powerpc
VDSO_CALL() wrapper
Le 12/08/2025 à 07:39, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit :
> The _rval register variable is meant to be an output operand of the asm
> statement but is instead used as input operand.
> clang 20.1 notices this and triggers -Wuninitialized warnings:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/timers/auxclock.c:154:10: error: variable '_rval' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> 154 | return VDSO_CALL(self->vdso_clock_gettime64, 2, clockid, ts);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/timers/../vDSO/vdso_call.h:59:10: note: expanded from macro 'VDSO_CALL'
> 59 | : "r" (_rval) \
> | ^~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/timers/auxclock.c:154:10: note: variable '_rval' is declared here
> tools/testing/selftests/timers/../vDSO/vdso_call.h:47:2: note: expanded from macro 'VDSO_CALL'
> 47 | register long _rval asm ("r3"); \
> | ^
>
> It seems the list of input and output operands have been switched around.
> However as the argument registers are not always initialized they can not
> be marked as pure inputs as that would trigger -Wuninitialized warnings.
> Adding _rval as another input and output operand does also not work as it
> would collide with the existing _r3 variable.
>
> Instead reuse _r3 for both the argument and the return value.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Foe-kbuild-all%2F202506180223.BOOk5jDK-lkp%40intel.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C611dd96dfdad4dcd55d708ddd9629305%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638905739611064850%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QcOje8P4T0%2BsqgkSaP%2BkT3fS875kqCZhxChDmvWVY%2Fg%3D&reserved=0
> Fixes: 6eda706a535c ("selftests: vDSO: fix the way vDSO functions are called for powerpc")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_call.h | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_call.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_call.h
> index bb237d771051bd4103367fc60b54b505b7586965..e7205584cbdca5e10c13c1e9425d2023b02cda7f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_call.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_call.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
> register long _r6 asm ("r6"); \
> register long _r7 asm ("r7"); \
> register long _r8 asm ("r8"); \
> - register long _rval asm ("r3"); \
> \
> LOADARGS_##nr(fn, args); \
> \
> @@ -54,13 +53,13 @@
> " bns+ 1f\n" \
> " neg 3, 3\n" \
> "1:" \
> - : "+r" (_r0), "=r" (_r3), "+r" (_r4), "+r" (_r5), \
> + : "+r" (_r0), "+r" (_r3), "+r" (_r4), "+r" (_r5), \
> "+r" (_r6), "+r" (_r7), "+r" (_r8) \
> - : "r" (_rval) \
> + : \
> : "r9", "r10", "r11", "r12", "cr0", "cr1", "cr5", \
> "cr6", "cr7", "xer", "lr", "ctr", "memory" \
> ); \
> - _rval; \
> + _r3; \
> })
>
> #else
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists