linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] mtd: ubi: skip programming unused bits in ubi headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152133202.103367.1754981828821.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:57:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>
Cc: chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>, 
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, 
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, 
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Alvin Zhou <alvinzhou@...c.com.tw>, leoyu@...c.com.tw, 
	Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: ubi: skip programming unused bits in ubi headers

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Cheng Ming Lin" <linchengming884@...il.com>
> An: "richard" <richard@....at>, "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
> "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@...com>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel"
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> CC: "Alvin Zhou" <alvinzhou@...c.com.tw>, leoyu@...c.com.tw, "Cheng Ming Lin" <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. August 2025 07:19:49
> Betreff: [RFC] mtd: ubi: skip programming unused bits in ubi headers

> From: Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
> 
> This patch prevents unnecessary programming of bits in ec_hdr and
> vid_hdr that are not used or read during normal UBI operation. These
> unused bits are typically already set to 1 in erased flash and do not
> need to be explicitly programmed to 0 if they are not used.
> 
> Programming such unused areas offers no functional benefit and may
> result in unnecessary flash wear, reducing the overall lifetime of the
> device. By skipping these writes, we preserve the flash state as much
> as possible and minimize wear caused by redundant operations.

We talk about programming a single (sub)page, right?

> This change ensures that only necessary fields are written when
> preparing UBI headers, improving flash efficiency without affecting
> functionality.

I have been told that writing 0xFF bytes to NAND should be avoided.
This is also why UBI initializes them to 0x00.

Do you have data which proves the opposite?

Thanks,
//richard