[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31c4039c-b131-4051-9621-e3e8f8e5ecf2@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:30:30 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@...nel.org>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Ackerley Tng" <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, Ryan Afranji <afranji@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, Isaku Yamahata
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, "Erdem Aktas" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, Rick
Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, Roger Wang <runanwang@...gle.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
"Pratik R. Sampat" <pratikrajesh.sampat@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 28/30] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest
On 8/13/25 9:05 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Sagi Shahar wrote:
..
>> + td_finalize(vm);
>> +
>> + printf("Verifying UPM functionality: explicit MapGPA\n");
>
> Not sure if Sean's comment regarding printf applies here.
>
> Personally, I don't mind the noise in the output. But I am running things
> by hand. I can see how having no output on success is a good thing when
> running a suite of tests.
Switching these to ksft_print_msg() could be an option that supports both
usages. ksft_print_msg() adds the "#" diagnostic prefix that should be ignored
by automation that is expected to understand TAP13.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists