lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzb47GuSPEjbA_dJON94Dw4JKzpWvR+qm4QQW2p+0z1rSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:05:19 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Shubham Sharma <slopixelz@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, 
	martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, 
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, 
	sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com, 
	shuah@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix typo in kprobe_multi_test.c

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 8:37 AM Shubham Sharma <slopixelz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Fixed a spelling mistake:
> - comparision -> comparison
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubham Sharma <slopixelz@...il.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> index e19ef509ebf8..f377bea0b82d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static bool skip_entry(char *name)
>         return false;
>  }
>
> -/* Do comparision by ignoring '.llvm.<hash>' suffixes. */
> +/* Do comparison by ignoring '.llvm.<hash>' suffixes. */

Is this the only typo in the entire BPF selftests? If we are doing
single character comment fixes, let's do it as one bigger pass,
instead of tons of tiny patches?

pw-bot: cr


>  static int compare_name(const char *name1, const char *name2)
>  {
>         const char *res1, *res2;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ