[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250814182022.GW7942@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:20:22 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: John Groves <John@...ves.net>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <shajnocz@...hat.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@...ron.com>,
Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 12/18] famfs_fuse: Plumb the GET_FMAP message/response
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 04:36:57PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 15:36, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> > I'm still hoping some common ground would benefit both interfaces.
> > Just not sure what it should be.
>
> Something very high level:
>
> - allow several map formats: say a plain one with a list of extents
> and a famfs one
Yes, I think that's needed.
> - allow several types of backing files: say regular and dax dev
"block device", for iomap.
> - querying maps has a common protocol, format of maps is opaque to this
> - maps are cached by a common facility
I've written such a cache already. :)
> - each type of mapping has a decoder module
I don't know that you need much "decoding" -- for famfs, the regular
mappings correspond to FUSE_IOMAP_TYPE_MAPPED. The one goofy part is
the device cookie in each IO mapping: fuse-iomap maps each block device
you give it to a device cookie, so I guess famfs will have to do the
same.
OTOH you can then have a famfs backed by many persistent memory
devices.
> - each type of backing file has a module for handling I/O
>
> Does this make sense?
More or less.
> This doesn't have to be implemented in one go, but for example
> GET_FMAP could be renamed to GET_READ_MAP with an added offset and
> size parameter. For famfs the offset/size would be set to zero/inf.
> I'd be content with that for now.
I'll try to cough up a RFC v4 next week.
--D
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Miklos
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists