linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 0/6] Refactor capability search into common macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250814205116.GA346877@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:51:16 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
	kwilczynski@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
	mani@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	gbayer@...ux.ibm.com, lukas@...ner.de, arnd@...nel.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/6] Refactor capability search into common macros

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:37:03PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 15:25 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...

> > I applied this on pci/capability-search for v6.18, thanks!
> > 
> > Niklas, I added your Tested-by, omitting the dwc and cadence patches
> > because I think you tested s390 and probably didn't exercise dwc or
> > cadence.  Thanks very much to you and Gerd for finding the issue and
> > testing the resolution!
> 
> Thanks, yes leaving out dwc and cadence makes sense. Though I do often
> also test on my private x86 systems this one was s390 only. Since I
> have you here and as you applied this one now and Lukas PCI/ERR stuff
> yesterday, is it possible that my series titled "PCI/ERR: s390/pci: Use
> pci_uevent_ers() in PCI recovery" somehow fell through your mail
> filters maybe due to not having any "PCI:" in a subject?

Nope, I saw it and am actually looking at it right now :)

I see there's some conversation about Lukas's series, so I expect some
minor rebasing, if only to add Reviewed-by and such.  Nothing unusual;
I treat these branches as drafts until the merge window.

Bjorn