lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250814090201.pdtvxqq3st65iooq@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:32:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Cc: "rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: Return current frequency when frequency
 table is unavailable

On 14-08-25, 16:52, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> In cases where the CPU frequency table (freq_table) is not available,
> the __resolve_freq() function will now return the current frequency
> (policy->cur) instead of the requested target frequency. This ensures
> that the system doesn't return an invalid or uninitialized frequency
> value when frequency scaling is not supported or not initialized.
> 
> This change improves the stability of the frequency scaling logic when
> the CPU frequency table is not populated, preventing errors related
> to unavailable frequency tables.

Is there a real problem you are facing ? Or a code that path can do
some harm ? I think this patch may end up breaking users.

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ