[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0af65202bca6ef30ee6530703db303e81ec190eb.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 12:57:16 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Kyle Hendry <kylehendrydev@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Fernández Rojas
<noltari@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] reset: bcm6345: add support for internal ephy
resets on bcm63xx
On Di, 2025-07-08 at 19:47 -0700, Kyle Hendry wrote:
> bcm63xx SoCs have a register in the gpio controller that controls some
> of the phy functionality. Some of the bits reset individual phys and
> need a driver to set.
>
> The other fields in the register configure phy power and will be set
> by the network device driver.
>
> Kyle Hendry (6):
> reset: bcm6345: add support for bcm63xx ephy control register
> dt-bindings: reset: add compatible for bcm63xx ephy control
[...]
Applied patches 1 and 2 to reset/next (in inverse order), thanks!
[2/6] dt-bindings: reset: add compatible for bcm63xx ephy control
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/pza/linux/commit/?id=a341bcfbfa74
[1/6] reset: bcm6345: add support for bcm63xx ephy control register
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/pza/linux/commit/?id=6e273caeacf0
Do you agree that patches 2-6 are not necessary?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists